OMG! I Fucked My Daughter's BFF 5

Any film that starts off with two acronyms in the title is already starting off with two strikes against it in my book. Of course, I'm a writer, and even when sending a text message, I take grammar very seriously. Language matters, after all. But whatever. The fact that the guy on the cover is the one I call douchey bangs doesn't help my opinion of this film, either. But at least a couple of these women are really hot, and I can ignore the premise long enough to get more than turned on by the results. Still, if they backed off on the premise, it would be so much easier.

Let's start with cover model Rachel Rose. Hers is the last scene in this film, and douchey bangs is wandering around being douchey. I don't really know why, other than he mumbles something about needing a bathroom. We hear a flush, and then he comes out with his shorts gone. And then he repeats his lines a couple of times. Then there was a problem with the disc and the film skipped ahead to Rachel having a dick in her mouth. She's wearing more clothes than I expected. More damaged section of the film, and it's a 69. More damage, and now they're both moaning with their mouths full. It's kind of like a porn roulette. What will be see next? It's a cowgirl sequence that's shot too low, where we can barely see Rachel. Go up more and we could see more of her. What is it with directors these days believing that the camera always has to be at the same level as the crotch? Seriously, I have a degree in this stuff - even though I never worked in film or television - and I know better than to film this way. This is basic stuff, and it seems like just about every director is getting it wrong lately. Finally it gets up a bit higher when Rachel starts to do the work in cowgirl, but the guy wants to do the thrusting instead. He also talks too much. Eventually there's a mouth shot, though the camera seems to want to stay far enough away that we can't see any details. What's the deal there, director?

Let's hit up Abby Cross, shall we? She comes in not wearing much at all and playing the seductress. Quite the body on Abby. A body that manages to be both tight and curvy at the same time... that's a bit rare, no? I was honestly stumped as to who was going to rub whom first, and if you had Abby rubbing her co-star first, you win. Then it's some making out, though with an oddly too much head room, but then Abby's top comes off and dang does she ever have really nice tits. Oh, and an amazing ass, too. I'd love to bury my face in that. Abby, please do an anal scene, okay? She gives a really nice looking blowjob, and then it's time for some cowgirl. The same camera angle problems here. Going up even just a little bit would let us enjoy her ass and thighs more. Why is this not common sense? Great spooning, though again, the crotch is the center of the shot. Moving the camera left and centering the bodies would be a much better angle for this. Reverse cowgirl mostly has that camera angle position, too. Just the little things, honestly. Then it's a facial in the end, and it's well captured. She seems to be reasonable eager to get her face coated, too. I love her attitude.

It's overall a good film, and the premise doesn't get in the way too much. Still, I do wish Devils would figure out that these scenes would work just fine without all the story. They have some incredibly hot women starring in their films, and the technical side of things is competent enough, even though they're starting to incorporate some of the same deficiencies almost all other studios are guilty of. But with four hot scenes, with two particularly hot women, and two other scenes that are also easy to watch, this one is definitely worth the purchase price.