She's So Small 13

Top talent. Great camera work. And yet only three stars. Why? Because it's all about marital sex, in which I include girlfriend-boyfriend copulation. It's routine, boring, about as exciting as watching a fly feasting on a banana peel. Movies by definition should be showcasing things that are unusual, unconventional, attention-grabbing. Otherwise, people would not watch them. And porn is not an exception. Consider the first scene. Ariana Marie is in a bathtub, prepping herself for the act. Then she dries up, examines herself in the mirror, and goes down the stairs to the living room where the hubby/boyfriend (it can be interpreted both ways) is snoozing on the loveseat. Then they do the industry routine - cowgirl, reverse cowgirl, doggy, spoon and missionary, all culminated by the traditional cum shot. Sounds fun? This brings us to a dilemma that, in my view, the adult entertainment industry has not resolved: should marital sex (or boyfriend-girlfriend sex for that matter) be celebrated in adult movies? My personal vote is a resounding no. Because marital sex is not sex. It is pro-creational copulation, or a rehearsal for that, which has zero entertainment value. And we are an ENTERTAINMENT industry. Why are directors like Ryan Madison and Greg Lansky so successful? Because they don't do marital sex. Ditto for the studio Evil Angel. Why do Digital Sin's "Hotwife" series have so many fans? Because they portray adultery rather than exploits in the marital bedroom. If the guys at PornPros fail to understand it, they'll keep wasting great talent like they did in "She's So Small 13."