Mommy Does Me

The title creeps me out. Let me just get that out of the way upfront. But what has me amused straight away is the opening screen: "This is an adult movie." Thanks for that. Mommy does Me holds very limited appeal to me. The plot involves a father with his adopted daughter, his stepdaughter, and then the mother is with the adopted daughter, too. Then the adopted daughter is with the new wife/mother. The new one then wants to with the father's son. I had been hoping for quite some time that the niche would back away from the mainstream. Hell, there was one studio that wasn't even bothering with the stepchild bit and was straight up portraying mother?daughter . I argue very strongly that the bad habits in our industry-from racism and misogyny to this very issue and general immaturity-are what keeps us out of the mainstream and so easily stigmatized. I insist porn and sexuality in general should be mainstream, but it should also be socially responsible. isn't that. At all. Or even close. This is a plot written for reality television, but the type no one would believe is real. The biggest problem for me is that I'd rather like to enjoy Dillion Harper. Granted, I'd enjoy her far more if she actually didn't have tan lines, but that's a personal thing. But the fact that she's allegedly with family, if not biological, just keeps the arousal factor a bit down. Literally, I suppose. Ultimately, Dillion and Lucy Tyler are the only two out of this bunch I'd like to see, too.

Sindy Lange does nothing for me, and Magdalene St. Michaels kind of scares me. Not to be rude about it, but she strikes me more as someone who is going to yell at me than be sexual (or I would find sexual). So everyone is basically in every combination that isn't portrayed as biological. Highlights include Lucy in just about every position (those are some incredibly nice legs there), but Dillion just didn't do it for me. The combinations weren't right at all. The technical elements are actually quite good: there really aren't any issues with the camera being too low and angled up, destroying all sense of perspective like so much other porn tends to do. The lighting is fine, the sound is find, and the video quality is reasonable. No, my issues are purely content-based.

The faux surprise you see on the back of the box, top center image, pretty much tells the whole story: let's stereotype everything up and not really bother to create, you know, humans for our characters. Ultimately, no, this is not a direction we need to be following. We don't need to find new ways to be antisocial. We already need to move away from racial stereotypes and degrading women-that last is subjective, but I draw the line where directors deliberately portray women as stupid or disposable. is not something we particularly need to have out front. If it's your thing, I apologize for ragging on you like this. But it does the exact opposite of turning me on. Let's move on.